Structured Abstract
| Document Title: | A Multi-Country Study of the Involvement of People Living with HIV / AIDS (PLWHA) in the Country Coordinating Mechanisms (CCM). October 2003 |
| Institution: | The Global Network of People Living with HIV / AIDS (GNP +) |
| Authors: | Andrew Doupe, supervisor : Stuart Flavell |
| Study commissioned by: | The Global Network of People Living with HIV / AIDS (GNP +) |
| Objectives: |
|
| Methods: | Synthesis of 74 completed questionnaires received from 13 countries - Bolivia, El Salvador, Cameroon, Chile, Honduras, Haiti, India, Malawi, Moldova, Nepal, Nigeria, Peru and Ukraine. Respondents: Chair of the CCM, CCM coordinator, ministry or government official, the PR, PLWHA or NGOs (on the CCM or not). Interviewers: people living with HIV / AIDS from the recipient country. Except for Bolivia and El Salvador, surveys were conducted between 15 August and 5 September 2003. |
| Results: | The main survey findings are presented and organised according to four main issues (see Summary of findings):
See Annex 1 for a GFATM Summary of Findings |
Summary
Annex 1
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
(Prepared by GFATM, as no author's summary available.)1. CCM Representation
Selection Process:Due to the short time frame for setting up the CCM, many CCM members were simply appointed or nominated.
PLWHA Representation:
All countries, except Moldova, have at least one PLWHA (or living with TB) as a CCM member.
Lengths of Terms
The length of terms which CCM members serve varies form country to country.
Size of CCM
Some countries noted that the size of the CCM affects its efficient functioning.
Meeting Attendance
In some countries, there are members of the CCM who do not regularly attend CCM meetings.
Ministry of Health
There was concern about the relative weight of the MoH in the CCM as well as the role of the Minister of Health, who is in many instances the Chair or the Vice-Chair of the CCM.
CCM Membership
In some countries, the PLWHA community did manage to select and elect their representatives on simple criteria such as technical skills in project handling as well as political and leadership capacity. In these countries, PLWHA both inside and outside the CCM report that members bring the voice and opinion of the organization they represent to their work on the CCM. Criteria used to select PLWHA members on the CCMs include: member of the national PLWHA network, leadership of existing organizations, work experience and commitment, communication and advocay skills, specialist in the particular area and the geographical location.
Lack of Technical Capacity
There were complaints about CCM members who have no or little technical knowledge of the three diseases.
Lack of Geographical Representation
In some countries, geographical representation was not balanced.
Other sectors
In some countries, organizations who play a significant role in their society vis-à-vis the three diseases are not represented in the CCM.
Marginalized Communities
The Nepalese CCM Secretary stated that the most affected groups such as men who have sex with men, sex workers and injecting drug users are generally not represented and should be.
Effect of GFATM
Even though many people lack information on the CCM, a large number of respondents answered that the CCM is the kind of forum where all stakeholders can be involved.
2. Ownership, Accountability, Monitoring and Evaluation
Ownership, AccountabilityThere appears to be some confusion as to who is accountable for the CCM and who is accountable for the GF process in-country. The PR is legally responsible, though the CCM is also responsible for the monitoring of the functioning of the GF in country. In addition, according to the GF guidelines, the CCM is the decision-making structure. However, the lack of legal status is a source of concern. A lack of communication is a primary cause of misinformation as to whom recipients are accountable. Concerns in the CCM process over ownership and accountability in country have increased with the creation of the PR, who is both responsible for the funds and legally accountable to the GF.
Monitoring and Evaluation
As regards a monitoring and evaluation plan for the CCM process, countries are in various stages of evolution.
3. Decision-Making Processes within the CCM
Decision-MakingIn general, the decision-making process for the CCM is either by consensus or by voting. In Nepal and Ukraine the Chair is taking decisions without these being referred to the CCM.
Language Issues
There could be conflicts between the use of local languages and English.
Access to CCM Meetings
In most of the countries involved in this study, CCM meetings are open to non-members.
Transparency and Accountability
One country has moved the CCM meetings from the Ministry of Health to a hotel.
Executive Committee
The formation of such a Committee varies across the countries.
Sub-Committes
Some countries have set up one or more sub-committees, which include financial, procurement, proposal development, monitoring and evaluation, as well as committees working on each of the three diseases.
CCM Secretariat
Of the 13 countries, only two have appointed a Secretary to the CCM.
4. Communication
Communications within the CCMAll countries indicated the strong need for better communication. There is a general lack of information on the vision, goals and objectives as well as the operation of the CCM and GFATM. Almost all CCMs are keeping minutes of meetings which are circulated to CCM members.
Communications outside the CCM
A few countrie reported a lack of communication to those outside of the CCM. Only two countries have CCM websites.







