Sustainability, Transition and Co-Financing

Working with countries to sustain hard-won gains and progress made against the three diseases is fundamental to the Global Fund’s approach. Strengthening sustainability requires both continued investments in reducing the burden of disease, while at the same time supporting countries to assume greater financing and responsibility for ending these diseases as epidemics as they move toward greater self-reliance. 

Ultimately, this will only be achieved with sustainable health systems that are fully funded by countries through their own resources. 

Guided by the Sustainability, Transition and Co-Financing Policy [ download in English ] , which was revised in 2024, the Global Fund partnership takes a holistic approach to sustainability. We do this by supporting the scale-up of new technologies and service delivery, catalyzing better and more efficient use of domestic financing, increasing our alignment with and implementation through national systems, and supporting strong national sustainability and transition planning to gradually support countries to assume full leadership of the national responses. 

The Global Fund defines sustainability as the ability of a health program or country to both maintain and scale up service coverage to a level in line with the epidemiological context. This provides for ongoing control of a public health problem and supports efforts for elimination of the three diseases, even after external funding by the Global Fund and other major external donors comes to an end. 

In practice, there are many factors that influence sustainability, which differ on a country-by-country basis and require country-tailored responses. Efforts to maintain sustainability gains and address challenges should consider financial, programmatic and political realities countries face. The Global Fund encourages and supports all countries to ensure sustainability is embedded into their national responses and grant design. 

The Global Fund is fully committed to the premise that countries must be self-reliant in financing and managing HIV, TB and malaria programs over time. Working hand in hand with countries, the Global Fund actively plans for transition away from Global Fund financing. 

The Global Fund defines transition as the mechanism by which a country, or a country component, moves towards fully funding and implementing its HIV, TB and malaria programs independent of Global Fund support. A successful transition is one in which previous gains against HIV, TB and malaria are maintained and scaled up, as appropriate, even after external support has come to an end. 

Disease components fully transition from Global Fund support when they are no longer eligible for funding, voluntarily transition, and/or have received their final allocation. Preparations for transition may also be affected by changes in the size of Global Fund allocations and/or the investments of other funding partners, which may require countries to progressively assume key parts of the national response well before they stop receiving Global Fund financing. For this reason, the Global Fund encourages countries to plan well in advance of expected transitions. 

Lessons learned suggest that successful transitions take time and require resources. Early and proactive planning is a key part of transition preparedness. The Global Fund supports countries to incorporate transition considerations into funding request development, grant design, grant implementation, national planning processes – including, where relevant, transition planning and assessments – and the overall management of national responses. 

The Global Fund proactively supports countries to undertake transition planning, and may provide transition funding to countries who become ineligible in order to help smooth the transition from Global Fund support. The Global Fund may also set transition timelines for eligible countries to ensure predictability in our funding. The Global Fund regularly publishes a list [ download in English ] of the disease components projected to transition from Global Fund support due to potential income classification changes.